This is a list of the ”’CPU power dissipation”’ of various [[central processing unit]]s (CPUs).
__TOC__
== Early CPUs ==
Note that these figures include power dissipation due to energy lost by the [[computer power supply|computer’s power supply]] and some minor peripherals. However, since the CPU component of these early computers easily accounted for most of the computer’s power dissipation, they are mentioned here:
* [[EDVAC]], 50 kW average
* [[ORDVAC]], 35 kW average
* [[UNIVAC I]], 124.5 kW average
== Microprocessors ==
If not stated otherwise, the watts dissipated refers to the peak-value.
Different architectures vary in how many operations they perform per clock cycle, so MHz/W values are not useful for comparing processors using different internal structure (see [[Megahertz myth]]). For other measures of energy efficiency in computing, see [[Performance per watt]].
=== [[IBM]]/[[Motorola]]/[[Freescale]] processors ===
{{main | List_of_Freescale_products#Microprocessors }}
==== [[PowerPC]]====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Lithiography !! Clock Speed !! Vcore !! Power !! Speed:Power ratio [MHz/W]{{Dubious|Suggestion for Mhz/Watt|date=November 2008}}
|-
| Dual-core PowerPC MPC8641D || 90 nm || 2 GHz || 1.2 V || 15-25 W || 100
|-
| PowerPC 750FX || 0.13 µm || 900 MHz || 1.2 V || 3.6 W || 250
|-
| PowerPC 750CXe || 0.18 µm || 600 MHz || 1.8 V || 6 W || 100
|-
| PowerPC MGT560 || 0.20 µm || 56 MHz || 2.7 V || 0.5 W || 112
|-
| PowerPC 440GX || ||800 MHz || || 4.5 W || 178
|-
| PowerPC 970 || || 1.8 GHz || 1.3 V || 42 W || 43
|-
| PowerPC 7400e || || 1.0 GHz || 1.6 V || 30 W || 33
|}
=== Marvell [[XScale]] ===
Marvell acquired an ARM license in 2003, and bought Intel’s XScale line in 2006, according to http://www.marvell.com/technologies/cpu_history/cpu_history.jsp Marvell’s useful history of processors.
* ”80321” 600 MHz, 0.5 [[watt]]
* PXA250
* PXA255
* PXA270
* [http://www.marvell.com/products/cellular/application/pxa300.jsp PXA300]
* [http://www.marvell.com/products/cellular/application/pxa310.jsp PXA310]
* [http://www.marvell.com/products/cellular/application/pxa320.jsp PXA320]
=== [[Intel]] processors ===
{{main|List of Intel microprocessors}}
==== Desktop processors ====
===== [[Intel P5|Pentium]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power !! Clock Speed to Power Ratio (MHz/W)
|-
| Pentium || 75 MHz || 8.0 W || 9.4
|-
| Pentium || 90 MHz || 9.0 W || 10
|-
| Pentium || 100 MHz || 10.1 W || 9.9
|-
| Pentium || 120 MHz || 11.9 W || 10.1
|-
| Pentium || 133 MHz || 11.2 W || 11.5
|-
| Pentium || 150 MHz || 11.6 W || 12.9
|-
| Pentium || 166 MHz || 14.5 W || 11.4
|-
| Pentium || 200 MHz || 15.5 W || 12.9
|}
===== [[Pentium MMX]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power !! Clock Speed to Power Ratio (MHz/W)
|-
| Pentium MMX || 166 MHz || 13.1 W || 12.7
|-
| Pentium MMX || 200 MHz || 15.7 W || 12.7
|-
| Pentium MMX || 233 MHz || 17.0 W || 13.7
|}
===== [[Pentium II]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Power !! Clock Speed to Power Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium II 233 || Klamath (350 nm) || 233 MHz || 34.8 W || 149.36
|-
| Pentium II 266 || Klamath (350 nm) || 266 MHz || 38.2 W || 143.61
|-
| Pentium II 300 || Klamath (350 nm) || 300 MHz || 43 W || 143.33
|-
| Pentium II 266 || Deschutes (250 nm) || 266 MHz || 16.8 W || 63.16
|-
| Pentium II 300 || Deschutes (250 nm) || 300 MHz || 18.6 W || 62
|-
| Pentium II 333 || Deschutes (250 nm) || 333 MHz || 20.6 W || 61.86
|-
| Pentium II Overdrive || Deschutes (250 nm) || 300 or 333 MHz || ||
|-
| Pentium II 350 || Deschutes (250 nm) || 350 MHz || 21.5 W || 61.43
|-
| Pentium II 400 || Deschutes (250 nm) || 400 MHz || 24.3 W || 60.75
|-
| Pentium II 450 || Deschutes (250 nm) || 450 MHz || 27.1 W || 60.22
|-
|}
===== [[Pentium III]] =====
Launched in 1999, the Pentium III became Intel’s first processor to break the 1 GHz clock speed barrier. By 2000, the Pentium III was replaced by the Pentium 4, which performed even worse in certain applications. Although, in 2001, Intel had resurrected the Pentium III by introducing the Tualatin core. The Tualatin-based Pentium III had well outperformed the Willamette-based Pentium 4 in a variety of applications. However, it appeared that Intel wanted to market the Pentium 4 as their main processor and tried to “kill” the Pentium III by reducing the L2 cache (in the non-S variants) to 256 KB from 512 KB in the Katmai and Coppermine cores and by making the Tualtain-based Pentium IIIs incompatible with older socket 370 motherboardshttp://www.emulators.com/docs/pentium_3.htm. The Pentium III-S have 512 KB L2 cache and have dual-processor support.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium III 450 || Katmai (250 nm) || 450 MHz || 33.76 W || 75.02
|-
| Pentium III 500 || Katmai (250 nm) || 500 MHz || 37.52 W || 75.04
|-
| Pentium III 533B || Katmai (250 nm) || 533 MHz || 39.04 W || 73.25
|-
| Pentium III 550 || Katmai (250 nm) || 550 MHz || 39.8 W || 72.36
|-
| Pentium III 600 || Katmai (250 nm) || 600 MHz || 42.76 W || 71.27
|-
| Pentium III 600B || Katmai (250 nm) || 600 MHz || 42.76 W || 71.27
|-
| Pentium III 500E || Coppermine (180 nm) || 500 MHz || 16 W || 32
|-
| Pentium III 533EB || Coppermine (180 nm) || 533 MHz || 18.02 W or 17.49 W || 33.81 (18.02 W), 32.81 (17.49 W)
|-
| Pentium III 550E || Coppermine (180 nm) || 550 MHz || 18.7 W or 18.15 W || 34 (18.7 W), 33 (18.15 W)
|-
| Pentium III 600 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 600 MHz || 22.05 W or 20.4 W || 36.75 (22.05 W), 34 (20.4 W)
|-
| Pentium III 600E || Coppermine (180 nm) || 600 MHz || 22.1 W or 21.45 W || 36.83 (22.1 W), 35.75 (21.45 W)
|-
| Pentium III 600EB || Coppermine (180 nm) || 600 MHz || 22.1 W, 21.45 W or 20.4 W || 36.83 (22.1 W), 35.75 (21.45 W), 34 (20.4 W)
|-
| Pentium III 650 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 650 MHz || 22.1 W or 21.45 W || 34 (22.1 W), 33 (21.45 W)
|-
| Pentium III 667 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 667 MHz || 22.61 W or 21.95 W || 33.9 (22.61 W), 32.91 (21.95 W)
|-
| Pentium III 700 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 700 MHz || 25.9 W, 23.8 W or 23.1 W || 37 (25.9 W), 34 (23.8 W), 33 (23.1 W)
|-
| Pentium III 733 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 733 MHz || 26.95 W, 24.82 W or 24.09 W || 36.77 (26.95 W), 33.86 (24.82 W), 32.86 (24.09 W)
|-
| Pentium III 750 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 750 MHz || 27.48 W, 25.5 W or 24.75 W || 36.64 (27.48 W), 34 (25.5 W), 33 (24.5 W)
|-
| Pentium III 800 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 27.2 W or 26.4 W || 34 (27.2 W), 33 (26.4 W)
|-
| Pentium III 800EB || Coppermine (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 29.05 W, 27.2 W or 26.4 W || 36.31 (29.05 W), 34 (27.2 W), 33 (26.4 W)
|-
| Pentium III 850 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 850 MHz || 30.28 W, 27.54 W or 26.73 W || 35.62 (30.28 W), 32.4 (27.54 W), 31.45 (26.73 W)
|-
| Pentium III 866 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 866 MHz || 30.8 W, 27.71 W or 26.9 W || 35.57 (30.8 W), 32 (27.71 W), 31.06 (26.9 W)
|-
| Pentium III 900 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 32.2 W or 28.9 W || 35.78 (32.2 W), 36.13 (28.9 W)
|-
| Pentium III 933 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 933 MHz || 32.9 W or 30.09 W || 35.26 (32.9 W), 32.25 (30.09 W)
|-
| Pentium III 1000 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 35.35 W or 32.98 W || 35.35 (35.35 W), 32.98 (32.98 W)
|-
| Pentium III 1000B || Coppermine (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 32.98 W || 32.98
|-
| Pentium III 1100 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 39.55 W || 35.96
|-
| Pentium III 1133 || Coppermine (180 nm) || 1.13 GHz || 39.55 W || 35
|-
| Pentium III 800 || Coppermine-T (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 38.2 W || 47.75
|-
| Pentium III 866 || Coppermine-T (180 nm) || 800 MHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium III 933 || Coppermine-T (180 nm) || 933 MHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium III 1000 || Coppermine-T (180 nm) || 800 MHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium III 1133 || Coppermine-T (180 nm) || 1.13 GHz || 29.1 W || 25.75
|-
| Pentium III 1000 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1 GHz || 27.6 W || 27.6
|-
| Pentium III 1000S || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium III 1133 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.13 GHz || 29.1 W || 25.75
|-
| Pentium III 1133S || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.13 GHz || 28.9 W or 27.9 W || 25.58 (28.9 W), 24.69 (27.9 W)
|-
| Pentium III 1200 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 29.9 W || 24.92
|-
| Pentium III 1266S || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.26 GHz || 30.4 W or 29.5 W || 24.13 (30.4 W), 23.41 (29.5 W)
|-
| Pentium III 1333 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 33.9 W || 26
|-
| Pentium III 1400 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium III 1400S || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 32.2 W or 31.2 W || 23 (32.2 W), 22.3 (31.2 W)
|}
===== [[Pentium 4]] =====
Released on November 20, 2000, the Pentium 4 was based on an all new microarchitecture codenamed NetBurst. Pentium 4 processors achieved their high clock speeds by using an extremely long instruction pipeline (20 stages in the Willamette, Northwood and Gallatin cores and 31 stages in the Prescott, Prescott 2M and Cedar Mill cores). The Pentium 4 became Intel’s hottest-running single-core processor along with their processor to have the longest instruction pipeline to date. Not only that, but the Pentium 4’s performance was usually disappointing, as it could not often match the performance AMD’s Athlon, Athlon XP and Athlon 64 processors, and for the first models, even Intel’s own Pentium III or even low-end processors such as the AMD Duron or the P6-based Intel Celeron. Intel tried to fix this problem with the introduction Prescott core, but it made the Pentium 4’s problems even worse, as they performed worse than Northwood-based Pentium 4s in the same clock speed range and generated more heat. The Pentium 4 had reached a clock speed limit of 3.8 GHz by November, 2004 and on January 5, 2006 Intel released the final Pentium 4 models using the Cedar Mill core, which gave off less heat than Prescott. All processors in the Pentium 4 HT range have Hyper-threading, a feature that makes one physical CPU core work as two logical cores.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium 4 1.3 || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 51.6 W || 39.69
|-
| Pentium 4 1.4 (Socket 423) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 54.7 W || 39.07
|-
| Pentium 4 1.4 (Socket 478) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 55.3 W || 39.5
|-
| Pentium 4 1.5 (Socket 423) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 57.8 W || 38.53
|-
| Pentium 4 1.5 (Socket 478) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 57.9 W || 38.6
|-
| Pentium 4 1.6 (Socket 423) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 61 W || 38.13
|-
| Pentium 4 1.6 (Socket 478) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 60.8 W || 38
|-
| Pentium 4 1.7 (Socket 423) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 64 W || 37.65
|-
| Pentium 4 1.7 (Socket 478) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 63.5 W || 37.35
|-
| Pentium 4 1.8 (Socket 423) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 66.7 W || 37.06
|-
| Pentium 4 1.8 (Socket 478) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 66.1 W || 36.72
|-
| Pentium 4 1.9 (Socket 423) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.9 GHz || 69.2 W || 36.42
|-
| Pentium 4 1.9 (Socket 478) || Willamette (180 nm) || 1.9 GHz || 72.8 W || 38.32
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0 (Socket 423) || Willamette (180 nm) || 2 GHz || 71.8 W || 35.9
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0 (Socket 478) || Willamette (180 nm) || 2 GHz || 75.3 W || 37.65
|-
| Pentium 4 1.6A || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 46.8 W || 29.25
|-
| Pentium 4 1.7A || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.7 GHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium 4 1.8A || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.8 GHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium 4 1.9A || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.9 GHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 54.3 W || 27.15
|-
| Pentium 4 2.2 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 57.1 W || 25.95
|-
| Pentium 4 2.26 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.26 GHz || 58 W || 25.66
|-
| Pentium 4 2.4 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 59.8 W || 24.92
|-
| Pentium 4 2.4B || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 59.8 W || 24.92
|-
| Pentium 4 2.5 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 61 W || 24.4
|-
| Pentium 4 2.53 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 61.5 W || 24.31
|-
| Pentium 4 2.6 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 62.6 W || 24.1
|-
| Pentium 4 2.66 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 66.1 W || 24.85
|-
| Pentium 4 2.8 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 68.4 W || 24.43
|-
| Pentium 4 2.8B || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 68.4 W || 24.43
|-
| Pentium 4 3.0 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3 GHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Pentium 4 3.06 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 81.8 W || 26.73
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 2.4C || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 66.2 W || 27.58
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 2.6 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 69 W || 28.75
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 2.8C || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 69.7 W || 24.89
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 3.0 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3 GHz || 81.9 W || 27.3
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 3.2 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 82 W || 25.63
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 3.4 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 89 W || 26.18
|-
| Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 3.2 || Gallatin (130 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 92.1 W || 28.78
|-
| Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 3.4 || Gallatin (130 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 109.6 W or 102.9 W || 32.24 (109.6 W) or 30.27 (102.9 W)
|-
| Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 3.46 || Gallatin (130 nm) || 3.46 GHz || 110.7 W || 31.99
|-
| Pentium 4 2.4A || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 89 W || 37.08
|-
| Pentium 4 2.66A || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 89 W || 33.46
|-
| Pentium 4 2.8A || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 89 W || 31.79
|-
| Pentium 4 505 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 84 W || 31.58
|-
| Pentium 4 505J || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 84 W || 31.58
|-
| Pentium 4 506 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 84 W || 31.58
|-
| Pentium 4 510 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 510J || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 511 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 515 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 84 W || 28.67
|-
| Pentium 4 515J || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 84 W || 28.67
|-
| Pentium 4 516 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 84 W || 28.67
|-
| Pentium 4 519 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 84 W || 27.45
|-
| Pentium 4 519J || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 84 W || 27.45
|-
| Pentium 4 519K || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 84 W || 27.45
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 2.8E || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 89 W || 31.79
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 3.0E || Prescott (90 nm) || 3 GHz || 89 W || 31.79
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 3.2E || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 89 W || 27.81
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 3.4E || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 89 W || 26.18
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 517 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 84 W || 28.67
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 520 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 520J || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 521 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 524 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 84 W || 27.45
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 530 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3 GHz || 84 W || 28
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 530J || Prescott (90 nm) || 3 GHz || 84 W || 28
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 531 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3 GHz || 84 W || 28
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 540 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 540J || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 541 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 84 W || 31.58
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 550 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 115 W or 84 W || 33.82 (115 W), 24.71 (84 W)
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 550J || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 115 W or 84 W || 33.82 (115 W), 24.71 (84 W)
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 551 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 115 W or 84 W || 33.82 (115 W), 24.71 (84 W)
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 560 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 115 W || 31.94
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 560J || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 115 W || 31.94
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 561 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 115 W || 31.94
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 570 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.8 GHz || 115 W || 30.26
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 570J || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.8 GHz || 115 W || 30.26
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 571 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.8 GHz || 115 W || 30.26
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 620 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 28
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 630 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3 GHz || 84 W || 31.94
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 640 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 84 W || 31.94
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 650 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 84 W || 30.26
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 660 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 115 W || 31.94
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 662 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 115 W or 84 W || 31.94 (115 W), 23.33 (84 W)
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 670 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3.8 GHz || 115 W || 30.26
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 672 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3.8 GHz || 115 W || 30.26
|-
| Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 3.73 || Prescott 2M (90 nm) || 3.73 GHz || 115 W || 30.83
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 631 || Cedar Mill (65 nm) || 3 GHz || 86 W || 28.67
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 641 || Cedar Mill (65 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 86 W || 26.88
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 651 || Cedar Mill (65 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 86 W || 25.29
|-
| Pentium 4 HT 661 || Cedar Mill (65 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 86 W || 23.89
|}
===== [[Pentium D]] =====
Released on May 26, 2005, the Pentium D was Intel’s first dual-core processor, and like the Pentium 4 it was based on the NetBurst microarchitecture. The Pentium D uses the multi chip module design, which incorporates two dies on one package, and the Pentium D was estentially two Prescott-based Pentium 4 cores in one chip. While this did increase TDPs, it was not by a significant amount. All Pentium D models are 64-bit. The Pentium Extreme Edition processors have Hyper-Threading, which all Pentium D models lack.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium D 805 || Smithfield (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 95 W || 35.71
|-
| Pentium D 820 || Smithfield (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Pentium D 830 || Smithfield (90 nm) || 3 GHz || 130 W || 43.33
|-
| Pentium D 840 || Smithfield (90 nm)|| 3.2 GHz || 130 W || 40.63
|-
| Pentium Extreme Edition 840 || Smithfield (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 130 W || 40.63
|-
| Pentium D 915 || Presler (65 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Pentium D 920 || Presler (65 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Pentium D 925 || Presler (65 nm) || 3 GHz || 95 W || 31.67
|-
| Pentium D 930 || Presler (65 nm) || 3 GHz || 95 W || 31.67
|-
| Pentium D 935 || Presler (65 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 95 W || 29.69
|-
| Pentium D 940 || Presler (65 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 130 W or 95 W || 40.63 (130 W), 29.69 (95 W)
|-
| Pentium D 945 || Presler (65 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 95 W || 27.94
|-
| Pentium D 950 || Presler (65 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 130 W or 95 W || 38.24 (130 W), 27.94 (95 W)
|-
| Pentium D 960 || Presler (65 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 130 W or 95 W || 36.11 (130 W), 26.39 (95 W)
|-
| Pentium Extreme Edition 955 || Presler (65 nm) || 3.46 GHz || 130 W || 37.57
|-
| Pentium Extreme Edition 965 || Presler (65 nm) || 3.73 GHz || 130 W || 34.85
|}
===== [[Core 2]] =====
The Core 2 brand was released to address the NetBurst processor’s heat and performance issues. The Core 2 brand is based on the P6 microarchitecture like the Pentium M and outperform the Pentium 4.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core 2 Duo E4200 || Conroe (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Core 2 Duo E4300 || Conroe (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 65 W || 36.11
|-
| Core 2 Duo E4400 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 65 W || 32.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo E4500 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 65 W || 29.55
|-
| Core 2 Duo E4600 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 65 W || 27.08
|-
| Core 2 Duo E4700 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 65 W || 25
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6300 || Conroe (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 65 W || 34.95
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6305 || Conroe (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 65 W || 34.95
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6320 || Conroe (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 65 W || 34.95
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6400 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 65 W || 30.52
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6305 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 65 W || 30.52
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6320 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 65 W || 30.52
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6540 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.33 GHz || 65 W || 27.9
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.33 GHz || 65 W || 27.9
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6600 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 65 W || 27.08
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6700 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 24.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6750 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 24.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || Conroe (65 nm) || 3 GHz || 65 W || 21.66
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X6800 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 75 W || 25.6
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6400 || Kentsfield (65 nm) || 2.13 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || Kentsfield (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 105 W or 95 W || 43.75 (105 W), 39.58 (95 W)
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6700 || Kentsfield (65 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 95 W || 35.71
|-
| Core 2 Extreme QX6700 || Kentsfield XE (65 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 130 W || 48.87
|-
| Core 2 Extreme QX6800 || Kentsfield XE (65 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 130 W || 44.37
|-
| Core 2 Extreme QX6850 || Kentsfield XE (65 nm) || 3 GHz || 130 W || 43.33
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7200 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 65 W || 25.69
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 24.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7400 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 65 W || 23.21
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7500 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 65 W || 22.18
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7600 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 65 W || 21.24
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8190 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 24.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 24.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8300 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.83 GHz || 65 W || 22.97
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 65 W || 21.66
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 3.16 GHz || 65 W || 20.57
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8600 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 3.33 GHz || 65 W || 19.52
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8200S || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.33 GHz || 65 W || 27.9
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.33 GHz || 95 W || 40.77
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8300 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 95 W || 38
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8400S || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 24.44
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8400 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 95 W || 35.71
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9300 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 95 W || 38
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400S || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 24.44
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 95 W || 35.71
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9450 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 95 W || 35.71
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9505S || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.83 GHz || 65 W || 22.97
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9505 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.83 GHz || 95 W || 33.57
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9550S || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.83 GHz || 65 W || 22.97
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9550 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 2.83 GHz || 95 W || 33.57
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || Yorkfield (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 95 W || 31.67
|-
| Core 2 Extreme QX9650 || Yorkfield XE (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 130 W || 43.33
|-
| Core 2 Extreme QX9770 || Yorkfield XE (45 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 136 W || 42.5
|-
| Core 2 Extreme QX9775 || Yorkfield XE (45 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 150 W || 46.88
|-
|}
===== [[Intel Core i5]] =====
The Core i5 is a mainstream variant of the Core i7 and is based on the Nehalem microarchitecture. The Core i5 lacks Hyper-threading and use a slower 2.5 GT/s DMI bus like the Lynnfield-based Core i7 and the mobile Core i7 processors.
{| class=”wikitable”
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core i5-750 || Lynnfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 95 W || 35.71
|}
===== [[Intel Core i7]] =====
Core i7 is currently Intel’s highest end series of processors designed for gaming desktops. Core i7 processors are the first to use the Nehalem microarchitecture, and therefore reintroduce Hyper-threading and, in the 9xx series, introduce Intel QuickPath Interconnect, a point-to-point link that is up to 16 times faster than a quad-pumped FSB. Core i7 processors use an integrated memory controller that supports DDR3 memory. The lower-end 8xx models use a substantially slower 2.5 GT/s Direct Media Interface bus.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core i7-860 || Lynnfield (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 32.86
|-
| Core i7-870 || Lynnfield (45 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 95 W || 32.42
|-
| Core i7-920 || Bloomfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 130 W || 48.87
|-
| Core i7-940 || Bloomfield (45 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 130 W || 44.37
|-
| Core i7-950 || Bloomfield (45 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 130 W || 42.48
|-
| Core i7-960 || Bloomfield (45 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 130 W || 40.63
|-
| Core i7-965 Extreme Edition || Bloomfield XE (45 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 130 W || 40.63
|-
| Core i7-975 Extreme Edition || Bloomfield XE (45 nm) || 3.33 GHz || 130 W || 39.04
|}
===== [[Intel Atom]] =====
The Intel Atom 230 is a single-core processor while the Atom 330 is a dual-core processor. These processors are used for ultra small form factor desktops called “nettops”. These processors, when paired with the nVidia GeForce 9400M G graphics processor and DDR2-800 or DDR3-1066 memory form the [[NVIDIA ION|nVidia ION]] platform. Atom CPUs use their own microarchitecture, which is why selected processors have Hyper-Threading.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Atom 230 || Diamondville (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 4 W || 2.5
|-
| Atom 330 || Diamondville (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 8 W || 5
|}
===== [[Celeron|Intel Celeron]] (P6 Based) =====
Celeron is Intel’s series of budget processors.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Celeron 266 || Covington (250 nm) || 266 MHz || 16.6 W || 64.333
|-
| Celeron 300 || Covington (250 nm) || 300 MHz || 18.4 W || 61.33
|-
| Celeron 300A || Mendocino (250 nm) || 300 MHz || 19 W || 63.33
|-
| Celeron 300A || Mendocino (250 nm) || 300 MHz || 20.9 W || 63.33
|-
| Celeron 333 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 333 MHz || 20.9 W || 62.76
|-
| Celeron 333 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 333 MHz || 20.9 W || 62.76
|-
| Celeron 366 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 366 MHz || 21.7 W || 59.29
|-
| Celeron 366 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 366 MHz || 21.7 W || 59.29
|-
| Celeron 400 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 400 MHz || 23.7 W || 59.25
|-
| Celeron 400 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 400 MHz || 23.7 W || 59.25
|-
| Celeron 433 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 433 MHz || 24.6 W || 56.81
|-
| Celeron 433 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 433 MHz || 24.1 W || 55.66
|-
| Celeron 466 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 466 MHz || 25.7 W || 55.15
|-
| Celeron 500 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 500 MHz || 27.2 W || 54.4
|-
| Celeron 533 || Mendocino (250 nm) || 533 MHz || ||
|-
| Celeron 533A || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 533 MHz || 11.2 W || 21.01
|-
| Celeron 566 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 566 MHz || 11.9 W || 21.02
|-
| Celeron 600 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 600 MHz || 12.6 W || 21
|-
| Celeron 633 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 633 MHz || 20.2 W || 31.91
|-
| Celeron 667 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 667 MHz || 21.1 W || 31.63
|-
| Celeron 700 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 700 MHz || 21.9 W || 31.29
|-
| Celeron 733 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 733 MHz || 22.8 W || 31,11
|-
| Celeron 766 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 766 MHz || 23.6 W || 30.81
|-
| Celeron 800 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 24.5 W || 30.63
|-
| Celeron 850 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 850 MHz || 25.7 W || 30.24
|-
| Celeron 900 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 26.7 W || 29.67
|-
| Celeron 950 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 950 MHz || 28 W || 29.47
|-
| Celeron 1000 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 29 W || 29
|-
| Celeron 1100 || Coppermine-128 (180 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 33 W || 30
|-
| Celeron 1000A || Tualatin-256 (130 nm) || 1 GHz || 29.5 W || 29.5
|-
| Celeron 1100A || Tualatin-256 (130 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 29.5 W || 26.82
|-
| Celeron 1200 || Tualatin-256 (130 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 29.5 W || 24.58
|-
| Celeron 1300 || Tualatin-256 (130 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 32 W || 24.62
|-
| Celeron 1400 || Tualatin-256 (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 33.2 W || 23.71
|}
===== [[Celeron|Intel Celeron]] (NetBurst based) =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Celeron 1.5 || Willamette-128 (180 nm) || 1.5 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Celeron 1.6 || Willamette-128 (180 nm) || 1.6 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Celeron 1.7 || Willamette-128 (180 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 63.5 W || 37.35
|-
| Celeron 1.8 || Willamette-128 (180 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 66.1 W || 36.72
|-
| Celeron 1.8 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 59.1 W || 32.83
|-
| Celeron 2.0 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2 GHz || 52.8 W || 26.4
|-
| Celeron 2.1 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 55.5 W || 26.43
|-
| Celeron 2.2 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 57.1 W || 25.95
|-
| Celeron 2.3 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 58.3 W || 25.35
|-
| Celeron 2.4 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 59.8 W || 24.92
|-
| Celeron 2.5 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 61 W || 24.4
|-
| Celeron 2.6 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 62.6 W || 24.1
|-
| Celeron 2.7 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 66.8 W || 24.74
|-
| Celeron 2.8 || Northwood-128 (130 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 68.4 W || 24.43
|}
===== [[Celeron D|Intel Celeron D]] =====
Celeron D is not a dual-core processor like Pentium D, it is branded Celeron D to distinguish it from older NetBurst-based Celerons (the same microarchitecture it is based on) and Celeron M.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Celeron D 310 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 73 W || 34.27
|-
| Celeron D 315 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.26 GHz || 73 W || 32.3
|-
| Celeron D 320 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 73 W || 30.42
|-
| Celeron D 325 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 73 W || 28.85
|-
| Celeron D 325J || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 84 W || 33.2
|-
| Celeron D 326 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 84 W || 33.2
|-
| Celeron D 330 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 73 W || 27.44
|-
| Celeron D 330J || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 84 W || 31.58
|-
| Celeron D 331 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 84 W || 31.58
|-
| Celeron D 335 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 73 W || 26.07
|-
| Celeron D 335J || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 30
|-
| Celeron D 336 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 84 W || 40
|-
| Celeron D 340 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 73 W || 24.91
|-
| Celeron D 340J || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 84 W || 28.67
|-
| Celeron D 341 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 84 W || 28.67
|-
| Celeron D 345 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 73 W || 23.86
|-
| Celeron D 345J || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 84 W || 26.47
|-
| Celeron D 346 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 84 W || 26.47
|-
| Celeron D 350 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 73 W || 22.81
|-
| Celeron D 351 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 84 W || 26.25
|-
| Celeron D 355 || Prescott-256 (90 nm) || 3.33 GHz || 84 W || 25.23
|-
| Celeron D 347 || Cedar Mill-512 (65 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 86 or 65 W || 28.1 (86 W), 21.24 (65 W)
|-
| Celeron D 352 || Cedar Mill-512 (65 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 86 or 65 W || 26.88 (86 W), 20.31 (65 W)
|-
| Celeron D 347 || Cedar Mill-512 (65 nm) || 3.33 GHz || 86 or 65 W || 25.83 (86 W), 19.52 (65 W)
|-
| Celeron D 347 || Cedar Mill-512 (65 nm) || 3.46 GHz || 65 W || 18.79
|-
| Celeron D 347 || Cedar Mill-512 (65 nm) || 3.6 GHz || 65 W || 18.06
|}
===== [[Celeron|Intel Celeron]] (Core based) =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Celeron 220 || Conroe-L (65 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 19 W || 15.83
|-
| Celeron 420 || Conroe-L (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 35 W || 21.88
|-
| Celeron 430 || Conroe-L (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 35 W || 19.44
|-
| Celeron 440 || Conroe-L (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Celeron 450 || Conroe-CL (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 35 W || 15.91
|-
|}
===== [[Celeron|Intel Celeron Dual-Core]] =====
Celeron Dual-Core is Intel’s budget dual-core microprocessors intended for low cost desktops.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core E1200 || Allendale (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 65 W || 40.63
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core E1400 || Allendale (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 65 W || 32.5
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core E1500 || Allendale (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 65 W || 29.55
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core E1600 || Allendale (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 65 W || 27.08
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core E3200 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 65 W || 27.08
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core E3300 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 65 W || 26
|-
|}
===== [[Pentium Dual-Core|Intel Pentium Dual-Core]] =====
Unlike the original Pentium processor, these Pentiums provide two cores on a single die instead of one core. The Pentium Dual Core series also use the same micro-architechture as Core2Duos. The Pentium Dual-Core processors bridge the gap between Celeron and Core 2. As of 2009, Intel branded Pentium Dual-Core processors as Pentium. The E5x00 and E6x00 series use the same wolfdale core as the Core2Duo series, and is essentially a Core2Duo E7x00 microchip with 1mb of L2 cache disabled.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2140 || Conroe (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 65 W || 40.63
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2160 || Conroe (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 65 W || 36.11
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 65 W || 32.5
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2200 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 65 W || 29.55
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2220 || Conroe (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 65 W || 27.08
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2210 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 65 W || 29.55
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5200 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 65 W || 26
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5300 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 65 W || 25
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 65 W || 24.07
|-
| Pentium E6300 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 65 W || 26
|-
| Pentium E6500 || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 65 W || 22.18
|-
| Pentium E6500K || Wolfdale (45 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 65 W || 22.18
|}
==== Laptop processors ====
===== [[Pentium II]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Mobile Pentium II 233 || Tonga (250 nm) || 233 MHz || 9 W || 38.62
|-
| Mobile Pentium II 266 || Tonga (250 nm) || 266 MHz || 10.3 W || 38.72
|-
| Mobile Pentium II 300 || Tonga (250 nm) || 300 MHz || 11.6 W || 38.67
|-
| Mobile Pentium II 266PE || Dixon (250 nm) || 266 MHz || 10.6 W || 39.85
|-
| Mobile Pentium II 300PE || Dixon (250 nm) || 300 MHz || 12 W || 40
|-
| Mobile Pentium II 333 || Dixon (250 nm) || 333 MHz || 12.7 W || 38.14
|-
| Mobile Pentium II 366 || Dixon (250 nm) || 366 MHz || 14.1 W || 38.53
|}
===== [[Pentium III]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium III-M 866 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 866 MHz || 19.5 W || 22.52
|-
| Pentium III-M 933 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 933 MHz || 20.1 W || 21.54
|-
| Pentium III-M 1000 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1 GHz || 20.5 W || 20.5
|-
| Pentium III-M 1066 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.06 GHz || 21 W || 19.81
|-
| Pentium III-M 1133 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.13 GHz || 21.8 W || 19.29
|-
| Pentium III-M 1200 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 22 W || 18.33
|-
| Pentium III-M 1266 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.26 GHz || 22 W || 17.46
|-
| Pentium III-M 1333 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 22 W || 16.54
|-
| Pentium III-M LV 733 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 733 MHz || 9.3 W || 12.69
|-
| Pentium III-M LV 750 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 750 MHz || 9.4 W || 12.53
|-
| Pentium III-M LV 800 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 800 MHz || 9.25 W || 11.56
|-
| Pentium III-M LV 850 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 850 MHz || 10 W || 11.77
|-
| Pentium III-M LV 866 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 866 MHz || 10.1 W || 11.66
|-
| Pentium III-M LV 933 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 933 MHz || 10.5 W || 11.25
|-
| Pentium III-M LV 1000 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 1 GHz || 11 W || 11
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 700 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 700 MHz || 7 W || 10
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 733 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 733 MHz || 7 W || 9.55
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 750 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 750 MHz || 7 W || 9.33
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 800 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 800 MHz || 7 W || 8.75
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 850 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 850 MHz || 7 W || 8.24
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 866 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 866 MHz || 7 W || 8.08
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 900 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 900 MHz || 7 W || 7.78
|-
| Pentium III-M ULV 933 || Tualatin (130 nm) || 933 MHz || 7 W || 7.5
|}
===== [[Pentium 4]] =====
Mobile Pentium 4 also had Hyper-Threading (HT) variants just like its desktop cousin. There was no Extreme Edition for mobile processors until the introduction of [[Intel Core 2|Core 2]]. While the Pentium 4-M had a decent TDP for the clock speed it offered, the mobile Pentium 4’s very high clock speed and TDP meant that laptops using the processor were subject to overheating and would require a powerful cooling unit. A significant increase in TDP can be observed with the increase to a 533 MHz FSB. In fact, these TDPs were so high, they exceed the TDPs of all desktop Core 2 Duo processors and even some desktop Core 2 Quad models. CPUs with a 400 MHz FSB were marketed as[[Pentium_4#Mobile_Pentium_4_M|”Mobile Pentium 4-M”]], whereas the later models with a 533 MHz FSB were [[Pentium_4#Mobile_Pentium_4|”Mobile Pentium 4″]].
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium 4-M 1.4 || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 25.8 W || 18.43
|-
| Pentium 4-M 1.5 || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 26.9 W || 17.93
|-
| Pentium 4-M 1.6 || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 30 W || 18.75
|-
| Pentium 4-M 1.7 || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 30 W || 17.65
|-
| Pentium 4-M 1.8 || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 30 W || 16.67
|-
| Pentium 4-M 1.9 || Northwood (130 nm) || 1.9 GHz || 32 W || 16.84
|-
| Pentium 4-M 2.0 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2 GHz || 32 W || 16
|-
| Pentium 4-M 2.2 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 35 W || 14.91
|-
| Pentium 4-M 2.4 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 35 W || 14.58
|-
| Pentium 4-M 2.5 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 35 W || 14
|-
| Pentium 4-M 2.6 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 35 W || 13.46
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 2.4 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 59.8 W || 24.92
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 66.1 W || 24.85
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 2.8 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 68.4 W || 24.43
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 70 W || 22.88
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 2.66 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 61 W || 22.93
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 2.8 || Northwood (130 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 68.4 W || 24.43
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 3.06 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3.06 || 70 W || 22.88
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 3.2 || Northwood (130 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 76 W || 23.75
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 518 || Prescott (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 88 W || 31.43
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.06 GHz|| 88 W || 28.76
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 538 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 88 W || 27.5
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 548 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.33 GHz || 88 W || 26.43
|-
| Mobile Pentium 4 HT 552 || Prescott (90 nm) || 3.46 GHz || 88 W || 25.43
|}
===== [[Pentium M]] =====
Pentium M is clocked slower than Pentium 4 and is derived from a more efficient [[Intel_P6_(microarchitecture)#Revived_architecture_in_Pentium_M_.28Banias_and_Dothan.29|P6]] microarchitecture. The Pentium M was launched to address the Pentium 4-M’s heat and performance problems. Notebooks using the Pentium M did not require a large and powerful colling unit and could be built thin and light. While the Pentium M was clocked at significantly slower clock speeds than the Pentium 4-M, it did manage to outperform the Pentium 4-M (for example, a 1.6 GHz Pentium M could outperform a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4-M). In contrast to this, the Pentium M’s main disappointment was in floating point operations, because the SSE2 implementations were not equal to those in the Pentium 4. Prefixes: LV=Low voltage, ULV=Ultra-low voltage.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium M 1.3 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 22 W || 16.92
|-
| Pentium M 1.4 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 22 W || 15.71
|-
| Pentium M 1.5 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 24.5 W || 16.33
|-
| Pentium M 1.6 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 24.5 W || 15.31
|-
| Pentium M 1.7 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 24.5 W || 14.41
|-
| Pentium M LV 1.1 || Banias (130 nm ) || 1.1 GHz || 12 W || 10.91
|-
| Pentium M LV 1.2 || Banias (130 nm ) || 1.2 GHz || 12 W || 10
|-
| Pentium M LV 718 || Banias (130 nm ) || 1.3 GHz || 12 W || 9.23
|-
| Pentium M ULV 900 || Banias (130 nm) || 900 MHz || 7 W || 7.78
|-
| Pentium M ULV 1.0 || Banias (130 nm) || 1 GHz || 7 W || 7
|-
| Pentium M ULV 713 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 7 W || 6.36
|-
| Pentium M 710 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 21 W || 15
|-
| Pentium M 715 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 21 W || 14
|-
| Pentium M 715A || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 21 W || 14
|-
| Pentium M 725 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 21 W || 13.13
|-
| Pentium M 725A || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 21 W || 13.13
|-
| Pentium M 730 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 27 W || 16.86
|-
| Pentium M 735 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 21 W || 12.35
|-
| Pentium M 735A || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 21 W || 12.35
|-
| Pentium M 740 || Dothan(90 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 27 W || 15.61
|-
| Pentium M 745 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 21 W || 11.67
|-
| Pentium M 745A || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 21 W || 11.67
|-
| Pentium M 750 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 27 W || 14.52
|-
| Pentium M 755 || Dothan (90 nm) || 2 GHz || 21 W || 10.5
|-
| Pentium M 760 || Dothan (90 nm) || 2 GHz || 27 W || 13.5
|-
| Pentium M 765 || Dothan (90 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 21 W || 10
|-
| Pentium M 770 || Dothan (90 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 27 W || 12.68
|-
| Pentium M 780 || Dothan (90 nm) || 2.26 GHz || 27 W || 11.95
|-
| Pentium M LV 738 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 10 W || 7.14
|-
| Pentium M LV 758 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 10 W || 6.67
|-
| Pentium M LV 778 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 10 W || 6.25
|-
| Pentium M ULV 723 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1 GHz || 5 W || 5
|-
| Pentium M ULV 733 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 5 W || 4.55
|-
| Pentium M ULV 733J || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 5 W || 4.55
|-
| Pentium M ULV 753 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 5 W || 4.17
|-
| Pentium M ULV 773 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 5 W || 3.85
|}
===== [[Intel Core|Core]] =====
The Core brand was launched on January 5, 2006, the same day as the final Pentium 4 models. Core processors focus on energy efficiency and a better performance per watt ratio, which the Pentium M already offered. The Core processors added SSE3 but continued to use a 32-bit instruction set. The instruction pipeline was reduced to 12 stages, yet the fastest Core processor achieved a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Pentium M, thanks to a new 65 nm manufacturing process. The Core Solo is actually a Core Duo with one processor core disabled. Intel did this because it was a simpler and cheaper way instead of altering the Core microarchitecture to manufacture Core Solo processors with only one physical core, which would cost extra time and money.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core Solo T1200 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 27 W || 18
|-
| Core Solo T1300 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 27 W || 16.27
|-
| Core Solo T1350 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 31 W || 16.67
|-
| Core Solo T1400 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 27 W || 14.76
|-
| Core Solo T1500 || Yonah (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 27 W || 13.5
|-
| Core Solo T1600 || Yonah (65 nm) || 2.16 GHz || 27 W || 12.5
|-
| Core Solo U1300 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.06 GHz || 6 W || 5.66
|-
| Core Solo U1400 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 6 W || 5
|-
| Core Solo U1500 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 5.5 W || 4.14
|-
|Core Duo L2300 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 15 W || 10
|-
|Core Duo L2400 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 15 W || 9.03
|-
|Core Duo L2500 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 15 W || 8.12
|-
|Core Duo T2050 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 31 W || 19.38
|-
|Core Duo T2250 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 31 W || 17.92
|-
|Core Duo T2300 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 31 W || 18.67
|-
|Core Duo T2300E || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 31 W || 18.67
|-
|Core Duo T2350 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 31 W || 16.66
|-
|Core Duo T2400 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 31 W || 16.94
|-
|Core Duo T2450 || Yonah (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 31 W || 15.5
|-
|Core Duo T2500 || Yonah (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 31 W || 15.5
|-
|Core Duo T2600 || Yonah (65 nm) || 2.16 GHz || 31 W || 14.35
|-
|Core Duo T2700 || Yonah (65 nm) || 2.33 GHz || 31 W || 13.3
|-
|Core Duo U2400 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.06 GHz || 9 W || 8.49
|-
|Core Duo U2500 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 9 W || 7.5
|}
===== [[Core 2]] =====
The Core 2 brand improves upon the original Core processors by adding a 64-bit instruction set to the intitial 32-bit one. In this range, the Core 2 Duo is the most significant processor line. The mobile Core 2 Quad is not clocked as high as its dekstop variant to avoid creating heat problems in laptops the way the mobile Pentium 4 did. Similar to the Core Solo, the Core 2 Solo is actually a Core 2 Duo processor with one core disable for the same reason as the Core Solo. The Core 2 Quad is two Core 2 Duo dies in one package. All Core 2 models manufactured at a 45 nm lithiography feature the SSE4.1 instruction set.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core 2 Solo U2100 || Merom-L (65 nm) || 1.06 GHz || 5.5 W || 5.19
|-
| Core 2 Solo U2200 || Merom-L (65 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 5.5 W || 4.58
|-
| Core 2 Duo LV7200 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 17 W || 12.78
|-
| Core 2 Duo LV7300 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 17 W || 12.14
|-
| Core 2 Duo LV7400 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 17 W || 11.33
|-
| Core 2 Duo LV7500 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 17 W || 10.63
|-
| Core 2 Duo LV7700 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 17 W || 9.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5200 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 34 W || 21.25
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5250 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 35 W || 23.33
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5270 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 35 W || 25
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5300 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 34 W || 19.65
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 34 W || 20.48
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5470 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 34 W || 21.25
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5500 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 34 W || 20.48
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5550 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 35 W || 19.13
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5600 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 34 W || 18.58
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5670 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 35 W || 19.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5750 || Merom (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5800 || Merom (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5850 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.16 GHz || 35 W || 16.2
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5870 || Merom (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5900 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 35 W || 15.91
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7100 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 35 W || 19.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7200 || Merom (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 34 W || 17
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || Merom (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7300 || Merom (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7400 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.16 GHz || 34 W || 15.74
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7500 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 35 W || 15.91
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7600 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.33 GHz || 34 W || 14.59
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7700 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 35 W || 14.58
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7800 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 35 W || 13.46
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7500 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.06 GHz || 10 W || 9.43
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 10 W || 8.33
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7700 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 10 W || 7.52
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X7800 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 44 W || 16.92
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X7900 || Merom (65 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 44 W || 15.71
|-
| Core 2 Solo SU3300 || Penryn-3M (45 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 5.5 W || 4.58
|-
| Core 2 Solo SU3500 || Penryn-3M (45 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 5.5 W || 3.93
|-
| Core 2 Duo P7350 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2 GHz || 25 W || 12.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo P7370 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2 GHz || 25 W || 12.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo P7450 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 25 W || 11.74
|-
| Core 2 Duo P7550 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.26 GHz || 25 W || 11.06
|-
| Core 2 Duo P8400 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.26 GHz || 25 W || 11.06
|-
| Core 2 Duo P8600 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 25 W || 10.42
|-
| Core 2 Duo P8700 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 25 W || 9.88
|-
| Core 2 Duo P8800 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 25 W || 9.4
|-
| Core 2 Duo P9500 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 25 W || 9.88
|-
| Core 2 Duo P9600 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 25 W || 9.4
|-
| Core 2 Duo P9700 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 28 W || 10
|-
| Core 2 Duo SL9300 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 17 W || 10.63
|-
| Core 2 Duo SL9380 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 17 W || 9.44
|-
| Core 2 Duo SL9400 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 17 W || 9.14
|-
| Core 2 Duo SL9600 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 17 W || 7.98
|-
| Core 2 Duo SP9300 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.26 GHz || 25 W || 11.06
|-
| Core 2 Duo SP9400 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 25 W || 10.42
|-
| Core 2 Duo SP9600 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 25 W || 9.88
|-
| Core 2 Duo SU7800 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 10 W || 7.69
|-
| Core 2 Duo SU9300 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 10 W || 8.33
|-
| Core 2 Duo SU9400 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 10 W || 7.14
|-
| Core 2 Duo SU9600 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 10 W || 6.25
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6500 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 35 W || 16.67
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6570 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 35 W || 16.67
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6600 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 35 W || 15.91
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6670 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 35 W || 15.91
|-
| Core 2 Duo T8100 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 35 W || 16.67
|-
| Core 2 Duo T8300 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 35 W || 14.58
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9300 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 35 W || 14
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 35 W || 13.83
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9500 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 35 W || 13.46
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9550 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 35 W || 13.16
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9600 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 35 W || 12.5
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9800 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.93 GHz || 35 W || 11.95
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9900 || Penryn (45 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 35 W || 11.44
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || Penryn (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 44 W || 15.71
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9100 || Penryn (45 nm) || 3.06 GHz || 44 W || 14.38
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9000 || Penryn QC (45 nm) || 2 GHz || 45 W || 22.5
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9100 || Penryn QC (45 nm) || 2.26 GHz || 45 W || 19.91
|-
| Core 2 Extreme QX9300 || Penryn QC XE (45 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 45 W || 17.79
|}
===== [[Intel Core i3]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core i3-320DM || Arrandale (32 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 35 W || 14.58
|-
| Core i3-420DM || Arrandale (32 nm) || 2.53 GHz || 35 W || 13.83
|}
===== [[Intel Core i5]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core i5-120DM || Arrandale (32 nm) || 1.06 GHz || 18 W || 16.98
|-
| Core i5-220DM || Arrandale (32 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 18 W || 15
|-
| Core i5-320DM || Arrandale (32 nm) || 2 GHz || 25 W || 12.5
|-
| Core i5-420DM || Arrandale (32 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 25 W || 11.74
|-
| Core i5-520DM || Arrandale (32 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 35 W || 13.16
|-
| Core i5-750 || Lynnfield (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 95 W || 35.71
|}
===== [[Intel Core i7]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Core i7-720QM || Clarksfield (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 45 W || 28.13
|-
| Core i7-820QM || Clarksfield (45 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 45 W || 25
|-
| Core i7-920XM || Clarksfield (45 nm) || 2 GHz || 55 W || 27.5
|}
===== [[Intel Atom|Atom]] =====
Intel Atom is a series of Ultra Low Voltage processors made for ultraportables called “netbooks” and ultra small form factor desktops called “nettops”. Because of their low clock speed, Intel Atom CPUs are highly energy efficient. Atom’s microarchitecture is unique from other Intel CPUs. Certain Atom CPUs have Hyper-Threading.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Atom N270 || Diamondville (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 2.5 W || 1.56
|-
| Atom N280 || Diamondville (45 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 2.5 W || 1.51
|-
| Atom Z500 || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 800 MHz || 0.65 W || 0.69
|-
| Atom Z510 || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 2 W || 1.82
|-
| Atom Z510P || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 2.2 W || 2
|-
| Atom Z510PT || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 2.2 W || 2
|-
| Atom Z515 || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.2 GHz (burst speed) || 1.4 W || 1.67
|-
| Atom Z520 || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 2 W || 1.5
|-
| Atom Z520PT || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 2.2 W || 1.65
|-
| Atom Z530 || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 2 W || 1.25
|-
| Atom Z530P || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 2.2 W || 1.38
|-
| Atom Z540 || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 2.4 W || 1.29
|-
| Atom Z550 || Silverthorne (45 nm) || 2 GHz || 2.4 W || 1.2
|-
|}
===== [[Celeron|Celeron M]] =====
Like the Pentium M, the Celeron M was specifically made for use in laptops.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Celeron M 600 || Banias (130 nm) || 600 MHz || 7 W || 11.67
|-
| Celeron M 800 || Banias (130 nm) || 800 MHz || 7 W || 8.75
|-
| Celeron M 310 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 24.5 W || 20.42
|-
| Celeron M 320 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 24.5 W || 18.85
|-
| Celeron M 330 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 24.5 W || 17.5
|-
| Celeron M 340 || Banias (130 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 24.5 W || 16.33
|-
| Celeron M 353 || Dothan (90 nm) || 900 MHz || 5 W || 5.56
|-
| Celeron M 373 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1 GHz || 5.5 W || 5.5
|-
| Celeron M 383 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1 GHz || 5.5 W || 5.5
|-
| Celeron M 205 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 21 W || 17.5
|-
| Celeron M 350 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 21 W || 16.15
|-
| Celeron M 350J || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 21 W || 16.15
|-
| Celeron M 360 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 21 W || 15
|-
| Celeron M 360J || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 21 W || 15
|-
| Celeron M 370 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 21 W || 14
|-
| Celeron M 380 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 21 W || 13.13
|-
| Celeron M 390 || Dothan (90 nm) || 1.7 GHz || 27 W || 15.88
|-
| Celeron M 215 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.53 GHz || 27 W || 17.65
|}
===== [[Celeron|Celeron Dual-Core]] =====
Celeron Dual-Core is Intel’s budget dual-core CPUs intended for low-cost computers.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core T1400 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 35 W || 20.23
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core T1500 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 35 W || 18.82
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core T1600 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 35 W || 21.08
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core T1700 || Merom (65 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 35 W || 19.13
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core T3100 || Merom (45 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 35 W || 19.44
|-
| Celeron Dual-Core T3100 || Penryn (45 nm) || 1.9 GHz || 35 W || 18.42
|}
===== [[Pentium Dual-Core|Pentium Dual-Core/Pentium]] =====
Intel Pentium (originally Pentium Dual-Core) is a line of single- and dual-core processors for lower-priced laptops. The SU2700 is the only single-core processor in the series and is intended for use with Intel’s [[Consumer Ultra-Low Voltage|CULV]] platform. It should be noted that the Pentium Dual-Core T2060, T2080 and T2130 are not 64-bit as they are based on the Yonah core. Prefixies: T=Standard Voltage, SU=Ultra Low Voltage.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2060 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 31 W || 19.38
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2080 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 31 W || 17.92
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2130 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 31 W || 16.67
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2350 || Yonah (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 31 W || 16.67
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2310 || Merom-2M (65 nm) || 1.46 GHz || 35 W || 23.97
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2330 || Merom-2M (65 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 35 W || 21.88
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2370 || Merom-2M (65 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 35 W || 20.23
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2390 || Merom-2M (65 nm) || 1.86 GHz || 35 W || 18.82
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T2410 || Merom-2M (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T3200 || Merom-2M (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core T3400 || Merom-2M (65 nm) || 2.16 GHz || 35 W || 16.2
|-
| Pentium T4200 || Penryn-1M (45 nm) || 2 GHz || 35 W || 17.5
|-
| Pentium T4300 || Penryn-1M (45 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 35 W || 16.66
|-
| Pentium SU2700 || Penryn-1M (45 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 10 W || 7.69
|-
| Pentium SU4100 || Penryn-1M (45 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 10 W || 7.69
|}
==== Server processors ====
===== [[Pentium Pro]] =====
Launched in 1995, the Pentium Pro was Intel’s first processor meant for servers as well as their first processor to use the P6 microarchitecture. The processor used a dual-cavity package, in which one cavity contained the die and the other cavity contained the L2 Cache, as the Pentium Pro’s L2 cache probably could not fit in the die. The Pentium Pro was substanstially faster than the Pentium and Pentium MMX in 32-bit applications, but in 16-bit applications, it was slightly slower than the Pentium and Pentium MMX processors. This is because the Pentium Pro was optimized for 32-bit applications.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Lithography !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Pentium Pro 150 || 600 nm || 150 MHz || 29.2 W || 194.67
|-
| Pentium Pro 166 || 600 nm || 166 MHz || 35 W || 210.84
|-
| Pentium Pro 180 || 600 nm || 180 MHz || 31.7 W || 176.11
|-
| Pentium Pro 200 (256 KB L2 Cache) || 600 nm || 200 MHz || 35 W || 175
|-
| Pentium Pro 200 (512 KB L2 Cache) || 600 nm || 200 MHz || 37.9 W || 189.5
|-
| Pentium Pro 150 || 350 nm || 150 MHz || 29.2 W || 194.67
|-
| Pentium Pro 166 || 350 nm || 166 MHz || 35 W || 210.84
|-
| Pentium Pro 180 || 350 nm || 180 MHz || 31.7 W || 176.11
|-
| Pentium Pro 200 (256 KB L2 Cache) || 350 nm || 200 MHz || 35 W || 175
|-
| Pentium Pro 200 (512 KB L2 Cache) || 350 nm || 200 MHz || 37.9 W || 189.5
|-
| Pentium Pro 200 (1 MB L2 Cache) || 350 nm || 200 MHz || 47 W || 235
|}
===== Single Core [[Xeon]] =====
[http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=594 Intel part numbers]
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Clock Speed (GHz) !! L2 Cache (KB) !! L3 Cache (MB) !! Thermal Design Power (W) !! Maximum Power (W) !! Minimum TCASE (°C) !! Maximum TCASE (°C) || Proc ID
|-
| 2.00 || 512 || || 58 || 66 || 5 || 70 || 0F27h/0F29h
|-
| 2.40 || 512 || || 65 || 75 || 5 || 74 || 0F27h/0F29h
|-
| 2.66 || 512 || || 72 || 83 || 5 || 74 || 0F27h/0F29h
|-
| 2.80 || 512 || || 74 || 86 || 5 || 75 || 0F27h/0F29h
|-
| 3.06 || 512 || || 85 || 101 || 5 || 73 || 0F27h/0F29h
|-
| 2.40 || 512 || || 77 || 86 || 5 || 72 || 0F25h
|-
| 2.66 || 512 || || 77 || 86 || 5 || 72 || 0F25h
|-
| 2.80 || 512 || || 77 || 86 || 5 || 72 || 0F25h
|-
| 3.06 || 512 || 1 || 87 || 102 || 5 || 70 || 0F25h
|-
| 3.20 || 512 || 1 || 92 || 110 || 5 || 71 || 0F25h
|-
| 3.20 || 512 || 2 || 92 || 110 || 5 || 71 || 0F25h
|}
===== Dual Core Xeon =====
[http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=594 Intel part numbers]
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power !! FSB !! L2 Cache !! L3 Cache !! Clock Speed to Power ratio (MHz/W)
|-
| 3040|| 1.86 GHz || 65 W || 1066 MHz || 2MB || || 28.6
|-
| 3050|| 2.13 GHz || 65 W || 1066 MHz || 2MB || || 32.8
|-
| 3060|| 2.40 GHz || 65 W || 1066 MHz || 4MB || || 36.9
|-
| 3070|| 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 1066 MHz || 4MB || || 41.0
|-
| 5030|| 2.67 GHz || 95 W || 667 MHz || 2x2MB || || 28.1
|-
| 5050|| 3.00 GHz || 95 W || 667 MHz || 2x2MB || || 31.6
|-
| 5060|| 3.20 GHz || 95 W || 1066 MHz || 2x2MB || || 33.7
|-
| 5063|| 3.20 GHz || 95 W || 1066 MHz || 2x2MB || || 33.7
|-
| 5080|| 3.73 GHz || 130 W || 1066 MHz || 2x2MB || || 28.7
|-
| 5110|| 1.60 GHz || 65 W || 1066 MHz || 4MB || || 24.6
|-
| 5120|| 1.86 GHz || 65 W || 1066 MHz || 4MB || || 28.6
|-
| 5130|| 2.00 GHz || 65 W || 1333 MHz || 4MB || || 30.7
|-
| 5140|| 2.33 GHz || 65 W || 1333 MHz || 4MB || || 35.9
|-
| 5150|| 2.66 GHz || 65 W || 1333 MHz || 4MB || || 41.0
|-
| 5160|| 3.00 GHz || 80 W || 1333 MHz || 4MB || || 37.5
|-
| 7120M|| 3.00 GHz || 95 W || 800 MHz || 2x1MB || 4MB || 31.6
|-
| 7120N|| 3.00 GHz || 95 W || 667 FSB || 2x1MB || 4MB || 31.6
|-
| 7130M|| 3.20 GHz || 150 W || 800 MHz || 2x1MB || 8MB || 21.3
|-
| 7130N|| 3.16 GHz || 150 W || 667 MHz || 2x1MB || 8MB || 21.1
|-
| 7140M|| 3.40 GHz || 150 W || 800 MHz || 2x1MB || 16MB || 22.7
|-
| 7140N|| 3.33 GHz || 150 W || 667 MHz || 2x1MB || 16MB || 22
|-
| 7150N|| 3.50 GHz || 150 W || 667 MHz || 2x1MB || 16MB || 23.3
|}
===== [[Xeon]] (Six Core, Core-based) =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Xeon E7450 || Dunnington (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 90 W || 37.5
|-
| Xeon E7458 || Dunnington (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 90 W || 37.5
|-
| Xeon E7460 || Dunnington (45 nm) || 2.66 GHz || 130 W || 48.87
|-
| Xeon L7455 || Dunnington (45 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 65 W || 30.52
|}
===== [[Itanium|Intel Itanium]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Itanium 733 || Merced (180 nm) || 733 MHz || 116 W || 158.25
|-
| Itanium 733 || Merced (180 nm) || 733 MHz || 130 W || 177.35
|-
| Itanium 800 || Merced (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 116 W || 145
|-
| Itanium 800 || Merced (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 130 W || 162.5
|}
===== [[Itanium|Intel Itanium 2]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Itanium 2 900 || McKinley (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 130 W || 144.44
|-
| Itanium 2 900 || McKinley (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 130 W || 144.44
|-
| Itanium 2 1000 || McKinley (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 130 W || 130
|-
| Itanium 2 1000 || McKinley (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 130 W || 130
|-
| Itanium 2 1400 || Madison (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz|| 130 W || 92.86
|-
| Itanium 2 1300 || Madison (130 nm) || 1.3 GHz|| 130 W || 100
|-
| Itanium 2 1400 || Madison (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz|| 130 W || 93.86
|-
| Itanium 2 1400 || Madison (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz|| 130 W || 92.86
|-
| Itanium 2 1500 || Madison (130 nm) || 1.5 GHz|| 130 W || 86.67
|-
| Itanium 2 1600 || Madison (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz|| 130 W || 81.25
|-
| Itanium 2 1666 || Madison (130 nm) || 1.66 GHz|| 130 W || 78.31
|-
| Itanium 2 1600 || Madison-9M (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz|| 130 W || 81.25
|-
| Itanium 2 1666 || Madison-9M (130 nm) || 1.66 GHz|| 130 W || 78.31
|-
| Itanium 2 1000 || Deerfield (130 nm) || 1 GHz || 62 W || 62
|-
| Itanium 2 1300 || Fanwood (130 nm) || 1.3 GHz || ??? W || ???.??
|-
| Itanium 2 1600 || Fanwood (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || ??? W || ???.??
|-
| Itanium 2 1600 || Fanwood (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || ??? W || ???.??
|-
| Itanium 2 MX2 || Hondo MCM (130 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 260 W || 236.36
|-
| Itanium 2 9010 || Montecito (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 75 W || 46.88
|-
| Itanium 2 9015 || Montecito (90 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 104 W || 74.29
|-
| Itanium 2 9020 || Montecito (90 nm) || 1.42 GHz || 104 W || 73.24
|-
| Itanium 2 9030 || Montecito (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 104 W || 65
|-
| Itanium 2 9040 || Montecito (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 104 W || 65
|-
| Itanium 2 9050 || Montecito (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 104 W || 65
|-
| Itanium 2 9110N || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 75 W || 46.88
|-
| Itanium 2 9120N || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.42 GHz || 104 W || 73.24
|-
| Itanium 2 9130M || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 104 W || 62.65
|-
| Itanium 2 9140N || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 104 W || 65
|-
| Itanium 2 9140M || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 104 W || 62.65
|-
| Itanium 2 9150N || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 104 W || 65
|-
| Itanium 2 9150M || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 104 W || 62.65
|-
| Itanium 2 9152M || Montevale (90 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 104 W || 62.65
|}
=== [[AMD]] processors ===
==== Desktop ====
===== [[AMD K5|K5]] =====
Released in 1996, the K5 was AMD’s first processor developed entirely in-house. It was supposed to yield similar performance results as Intel’s Pentium Pro, but the results were more comparable to a Pentium as AMD at the time was not as mature a company as Intel. Later K5 models were given a PR rating, in which they would perform as well as a processor with a higher clock speed at a lower clock speed. K5 processors were not given core names.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Lithiography !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| K5 75 || 350 nm || 75 MHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| K5 90 || 350 nm || 90 MHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| K5 PR75 || 350 nm || 75 MHz || 11.8 W || 157.33
|-
| K5 PR90 || 350 nm || 90 MHz || 14.3 W || 158.89
|-
| K5 PR100 || 350 nm || 100 MHz || 15.8 W || 158
|-
| K5 PR120 || 350 nm || 90 MHz || 12.6 W || 140
|-
| K5 PR133 || 350 nm || 100 MHz || 14 W || 140
|-
| K5 PR150 || 350 nm || 116.7 MHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| K5 PR166 || 350 nm || 116.7 MHz || 16.4 W || 140.53
|-
| K5 PR200 || 350 nm || 133 MHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|}
===== [[Athlon]] =====
Released in 1999, the Athlon was AMD’s highest performing processor until the introduction of the Athlon XP and was considered a “seventh generation” processor in its time. The Athlon used a double-pumped FSB that ran at either 200 MHz or 266 MHz, or twice as fast as the Pentium III’s FSB. But the Athlon and Pentium III both still reached a clock speed barrier of 1.4 GHz, with the Athlon giving significantly off more heat than the Pentium III, yet offering better performance. Athlon processors did not have an actual model number, as did other AMD or Intel processors at the time. The number following the word ”Athlon” represents the procesosor’s clock speed in megahertz.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Athlon 500 || Argon (250 nm) || 500 MHz || 42 W || 84
|-
| Athlon 550 || Argon (250 nm) || 550 MHz || 46 W || 83.64
|-
| Athlon 600 || Argon (250 nm) || 600 MHz || 50 W || 83.33
|-
| Athlon 650 || Argon (250 nm) || 650 MHz || 54 W || 83.08
|-
| Athlon 700 || Argon (250 nm) || 700 MHz || 50 W || 71.43
|-
| Athlon 550 || Argon (250 nm) || 550 MHz || 46 W || 83.64
|-
| Athlon 600 || Argon (250 nm) || 600 MHz || 50 W || 83.33
|-
| Athlon 550 || Pluto (180 nm) || 550 MHz || 31 W || 56.36
|-
| Athlon 600 || Pluto (180 nm) || 600 MHz || 34 W || 56.67
|-
| Athlon 650 || Pluto (180 nm) || 650 MHz || 36 W || 55.38
|-
| Athlon 700 || Pluto (180 nm) || 700 MHz || 39 W || 55.71
|-
| Athlon 750 || Pluto (180 nm) || 750 MHz || 40 W || 53.33
|-
| Athlon 800 || Pluto (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 48 W || 60
|-
| Athlon 850 || Pluto (180 nm) || 850 MHz || 50 W || 58.82
|-
| Athlon 900 || Orion (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 60 W || 66.67
|-
| Athlon 950 || Orion (180 nm) || 950 MHz || 62 W || 65.26
|-
| Athlon 900 || Orion (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 60 W || 66.67
|-
| Athlon 1000 || Orion (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 62 W || 62
|-
| Athlon 600 || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 600 MHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Athlon 650 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 650 MHz || 36.1 W || 55.54
|-
| Athlon 650 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 650 MHz || 36.1 W || 55.54
|-
| Athlon 700 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 700 MHz || 38.3 W || 54.71
|-
| Athlon 700 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 700 MHz || 38.3 W || 54.71
|-
| Athlon 750 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 750 MHz || 40.4 W || 53.87
|-
| Athlon 750 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 750 MHz || 40.4 W || 53.87
|-
| Athlon 800 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 42.6 W || 53.25
|-
| Athlon 800 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 42.6 W || 53.25
|-
| Athlon 850 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 850 MHz || 44.8 W || 52.71
|-
| Athlon 850 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 850 MHz || 44.8 W || 52.71
|-
| Athlon 900 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 49.7 W || 55.22
|-
| Athlon 900 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 49.7 W || 55.22
|-
| Athlon 950 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 950 MHz || 52 W || 54.74
|-
| Athlon 950 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 950 MHz || 52 W || 54.74
|-
| Athlon 1000 (Slot A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 54.3 W || 54.3
|-
| Athlon 1000 (Socket A) || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 54 W || 54
|-
| Athlon 1000B || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 54.3 W || 54.75
|-
| Athlon 1000C || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 55.1 W || 55.1
|-
| Athlon 1100B || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 60.3 W || 54.82
|-
| Athlon 1133C || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.13 GHz || 62.1 W || 54.96
|-
| Athlon 1200B || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 65.7 W || 54.75
|-
| Athlon 1200C || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 65.7 W || 54.75
|-
| Athlon 1266C || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.26 GHz || 66.9 W || 53.1
|-
| Athlon 1300B || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 68.3 W || 52.54
|-
| Athlon 1333C || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 69.8 W || 52.48
|-
| Athlon 1400B || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 72.1 W || 51.5
|-
| Athlon 1400C || Thunderbird (180 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 72.1 W || 51.5
|}
===== [[Athlon XP]] =====
Around this time, AMD gave their processors a name which indicated the equivalent clock speed when measured against the Thunderbird-based Athlon[[PR rating|Wikipedia PR Rating Page]]. For example, the Athlon XP 1800+ would, in theory, have offered similar performance to a Thunderbird-based Athlon at clocked at 1.8 GHz despite being clocked at only 1.53 GHz, since it did more per clock cycle.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Athlon XP 1500+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.33 GHz || 60 W || 45.11
|-
| Athlon XP 1600+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 62.8 W || 44.86
|-
| Athlon XP 1700+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.46 GHz || 64 W || 43.84
|-
| Athlon XP 1800+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.53 GHz || 66 W || 43.14
|-
| Athlon XP 1900+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 68 W || 42.5
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 70 W || 42.17
|-
| Athlon XP 2100+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 72 W || 41.62
|-
| Athlon XP 1600+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 48.5 W || 34.64
|-
| Athlon XP 1700+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.46 GHz || 49.4 W || 33.84
|-
| Athlon XP 1800+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.53 GHz || 51 W || 33.33
|-
| Athlon XP 1900+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 52.5 W || 32.81
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 60.3 W || 36.33
|-
| Athlon XP 2100+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.73 GHz || 62.1 W || 35.9
|-
| Athlon XP 2200+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 67.9 W or 62.8 W || 37.72 (67.9 W), 34.89 (62.8 W)
|-
| Athlon XP 2400+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 2.08 GHz || 68.3 W || 32.84
|-
| Athlon XP 2600+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 68.3 W || 32.07
|-
| Athlon XP 2600+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 2.13 GHz || 68.3 W || 32.07
|-
| Athlon XP 2700+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 2.16 GHz || 68.3 W || 31.62
|-
| Athlon XP 2800+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 2.25 GHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || Thorton (130 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 60.3 W || 36.33
|-
| Athlon XP 2200+ || Thorton (130 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 62.8 W || 34.89
|-
| Athlon XP 3100+ || Thorton (130 nm) || 2.2 GHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Athlon XP 2500+ || Barton (130 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 68.3 W || 37.32
|-
| Athlon XP 2600+ || Barton (130 nm) || 1.91 GHz || 68.3 W || 35.76
|-
| Athlon XP 2700+ || Barton (130 nm) || 2 GHz || 68.3 W || 31.62
|-
| Athlon XP 2900+ || Barton (130 nm) || 2 GHz || ??.? W || ??.??
|-
| Athlon XP 3000+ || Barton (130 nm) || 2.16 GHz || 74.3 W || 34.4
|-
| Athlon XP 3200+ || Barton (130 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 76.8 W || 34.91
|-
| Athlon XP 3200+ || Barton (130 nm) || 2.33 GHz || ??.? W || ??.?
|}
===== AMD [[Athlon 64]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
!Model !! L2 Cache !! [[Volt]]age (V) !! Power ([[Watt|W]]) !! Process (nanometers) !! Clock Speed to Power ratio (MHz/W)
|-
| ”Newcastle” Athlon 64 2800+ || 512 KB || 1.50 || 89 || 130
|-
| ”Venice” Athlon 64 3200+ || 512 KB || 1.45 || 67 || 90
|-
| ”Clawhammer” Athlon 64 3400+ || 1 MB || 1.50 || 89 || 130
|-
| ”Winchester” Athlon 64 3500+ || 512 KB || 1.40 || 67 || 90
|-
| ”Orleans” Athlon 64 3500+ EE ”’SFF”’|| 512 KB || 1.20 – 1.25 || ”’35”’ || 90
|-
| ”Lima” Athlon 64 3500+ || 512 KB || 1.20 – 1.35 || 45 || 65
|-
| ”Orleans” Athlon 64 3800+ || 512 KB || 1.40 || 62 || 90
|-
| ”Lima” Athlon 64 3800+ || 512 KB || 1.25 – 1.40 || 45 || 65
|-
| ”Orleans” Athlon 64 4000+ || 512 KB || 1.25 – 1.40 || 62 || 90
|-
| ”San Diego” Athlon 64 4000+ || 1 MB || 1.35 || 89 || 90
|-
| ”Orleans” Athlon 64 LE-1600 (2.2 GHz) || 1 MB || 1.25 – 1.40 || 45 || 90 || 48.9
|-
| ”Orleans” Athlon 64 LE-1620 (2.4 GHz) || 1 MB || 1.25 – 1.40 || 45 || 90 || 53.3
|}
===== AMD [[Athlon 64 X2|Athlon 64 X2 / Athlon X2]] =====
”’AMD Athlon X2”’ ”([[Socket 939]])” . . [http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopCPUResult.aspx?f1=AMD+Athlon%e2%84%a2+64+X2+Dual-Core&f2=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&f7=&f8=&f9=2000& AMD part numbers] . . [[List of AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors|List of AMD MPUs]]
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Core !! Processor !! Model !! Clock Speed !! L2 Cache !! Voltage !! [[Thermal Design Power|TDP]] !! Clock Speed to TDP ratio (MHz/W)
|-
| E6|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4800+ || 2400 MHz || 2 MB || 1.30-1.40 V || 110 W || 21.8
|-
| || Athlon 64 X2|| 4600+ || 2400 MHz || 1 MB || 1.30-1.40 V || 110 W || 21.8
|-
| E6/E6|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4400+ || 2200 MHz || 2 MB || 1.30-1.40 V || 89 W/110 W || 24.7/20
|-
| || Athlon 64 X2|| 4200+ || 2200 MHz || 1 MB || 1.30-1.40 V || 89 W || 24.7
|-
| F2 || Athlon 64 X2|| 3800+ || 2000 MHz || 1 MB || 1.20-1.25 V || 65 W || 30
|-
| E4/E6 || Athlon 64 X2|| 3800+ || 2000 MHz || 1 MB || 1.30-1.40 V || 89 W/89 W || 22.4
|-
| G1|| Athlon 64 X2|| 3600+ || 1900 MHz || 1 MB || 1.25V-1.35 V || 65 W || 29.2
|}
”’AMD Athlon X2”’ ”([[Socket AM2]])”
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Core !! Processor !! Model !! Clock Speed !! L2 Cache !! Voltage !! [[Thermal Design Power|TDP]] !! Clock Speed to TDP ratio (MHz/W)
|-
| ”Windsor”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 3600+|| 2000 MHz || 512 KB || 1.25 V || 89 W || 22.5
|-
| ”Brisbane”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 3600+ EE|| 1900 MHz || 1 MB || 1.30 V || ”’65 W”’ || 29.2
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 3800+|| 2000 MHz || 1 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V || 89 W || 22.5
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 3800+ EE|| 2000 MHz || 1 MB || 1.20 – 1.25 V || ”’65 W”’ || 30.8
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 3800+ EE ”’SFF”’|| 2000 MHz || 1 MB || 1.025 – 1.075 V || ”’35 W”’ || ”’57.1”’
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4000+|| 2000 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V || 89 W || 22.5
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4000+|| 2000 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.20 – 1.25 V || ”’65 W”’ || 30.8
|-
| ”Brisbane G1”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4000+|| 2100 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.25 – 1.35 V || ”’65 W”’ || 32.3
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4050e|| 2100 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.15/1.20/1.25 V || ”’45 W”’ || 46.7
|-
| ”Brisbane G1”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4200+ EE|| 2200 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.25/1.30/1.325 V || ”’65 W”’ || 33.8
|-
| ”Windsor”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4200+ EE|| 2200 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.20 – 1.25 V || ”’65 W”’ || 33.8
|-
| ”Windsor”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4200+|| 2200 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V || 89 W || 24.7
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4400+|| 2200 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.20V/1.25 V || ”’65 W”’ || 33.8
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4400+|| 2200 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.30V/1.35 V || 89 W || 24.7
|-
| ”Brisbane G1”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4400+|| 2300 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.25/1.35 V || ”’65 W”’ || 35.4
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4400+|| 2300 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.325/1.35/1.375 V || ”’65 W”’ || 35.4
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4450e|| 2300 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.15/1.20/1.25 V || ”’45 W”’ || ”’51.1”’
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4600+ EE|| 2400 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.325/1.35/1.375 V || ”’65 W”’ || 36.9
|-
| ”Windsor”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4600+ EE|| 2400 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.20 – 1.25 V || ”’65 W”’ || 36.9
|-
| ”Windsor”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4600+|| 2400 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V || 89 W || 27.0
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4800+|| 2400 MHz|| 2 MB|| 1.20 – 1.25 V|| ”’65 W”’ || 36.9
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4800+|| 2400 MHz|| 2 MB|| 1.30 – 1.35 V|| 89 W || 27.0
|-
| ”Brisbane G1”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4800+|| 2500 MHz|| 1 MB|| 1.25V – 1.35 V|| 65 W || 38.5
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4800+|| 2500 MHz|| 1 MB|| 1.325 – 1.375V|| 65 W || 38.5
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 4850e|| 2500 MHz|| 1 MB|| 1.15/1.20/1.25 V|| ”’45 W”’ || ”’55.6”’
|-
| ”Brisbane”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5000+|| 2600 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.25 – 1.35 V || ”’65 W”’ || 40.0
|-
| ”Brisbane”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5000+ Black Edition|| 2600 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.25 – 1.35 V || ”’65 W”’ || 40.0
|-
| ”Windsor”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5000+ EE|| 2600 MHz || 1 MB || 1.20 – 1.25 V || ”’65 W”’ || 40.0
|-
| ”Windsor”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5000+|| 2600 MHz || 1 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V || 89 W || 29.2
|-
| ”Windsor F3”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5200+ EE|| 2600 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.20 – 1.25 V || ”’65 W”’ || 40.0
|-
| ”Windsor F2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5200+|| 2600 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V || 89 W || 29.2
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5200+|| 2700 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.325/1.35/1.375 V || ”’65 W”’ || 41.5
|-
| ”Windsor F3”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5400+|| 2800 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V || 89 W || 31.5
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5400+|| 2800 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.325V – 1.375 V || ”’65 W”’ || 43.1
|-
| ”Windsor F3”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5600+|| 2800 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.30-1.35 V || 89W || 40.6
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 5600+|| 2900 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.30-1.35 V || ”’65 W”’ || 44.6
|-
| ”Windsor F3”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 6000+|| 3000 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.35 – 1.40 V || 125 W || 24.0
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 6000+ EE|| 3100 MHz|| 1 MB || 1.30 – 1.35 V|| 89 W || 34.8
|-
| ”Windsor F3”|| Athlon 64 X2|| 6400+ Black Edition|| 3200 MHz|| 2 MB || 1.35 – 1.40 V || 125 W || 25.6
|}
”’AMD [[Athlon X2]]”’ . .
[http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopCPUResult.aspx?f1=AMD+Athlon%e2%84%a2+X2+Dual-Core&f2=&f3=&f4=512&f5=AM2&f6=&f7=65nm+SOI&f8=45.000&f9=2000& AMD part numbers] . . [[List of AMD Athlon X2 microprocessors|List of AMD MPUs]]
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Core !! Processor !! Model !! Clock Speed !! L2 Cache !! Voltage !! Socket !! [[Thermal Design Power|TDP]]!! Note
|-
| ”Brisbane G2”|| Athlon X2|| BE-2400|| 2300 MHz|| 2×512 KB|| 1.25V|| AM2|| 45 W|| Oct-2007
|-
| ”Brisbane G1”|| Athlon X2|| BE-2350|| 2100 MHz|| 2×512 KB|| 1.25V|| AM2|| 45 W|| June-2007
|-
| ”Brisbane G1”|| Athlon X2|| BE-2300|| 1900 MHz|| 2×512 KB|| 1.25V|| AM2|| 45 W|| June-2007
|}
===== [[Athlon 64 FX]] =====
Introduced at the same time as the Athlon 64, the Athlon FX was (and still is) one of AMD’s most expensive consumer processors, with some models costing over $1000. The two-digit model number on the Athlon 64 FX cannot be used to compare it to an Intel or AMD processor. Models FX-60, FX-62, FX-70, FX-72 and FX-74 are dual-core and the rest are single-core. The Athlon FX competed primarily with Intel’s Pentium 4 Extreme Edition and dual-core Pentium Extreme Edition. The dual-core Athlon FX models were eligible for AMD’s Quad FX platform, which pair two Athlon FX processors on a single motherboard to yield four total processing cores.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-51 || SledgeHammer (130 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 89 W || 40.45
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-53 || SledgeHammer (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 89 W || 37.08
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-53 || ClawHammer (130 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 89 W || 37.08
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-55 || ClawHammer (130 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 104 W || 40
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-55 || San Diego (90 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 104 W || 40
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-57 || San Diego (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 104 W || 37.14
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-60 || Toledo (90 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 110 W || 42.31
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-62 || Windsor (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 125 W || 44.64
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-70 || Windsor (90 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 125 W || 48.08
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-72 || Windsor (90 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 125 W || 44.64
|-
| Athlon 64 FX-74 || Windsor (90 nm) || 3 GHz || 125 W || 41.66
|}
===== [[Athlon X2]] (K10-based) =====
With the launch of the Phenom line, the Athlon line was repositioned as a mainstream brand, instead of being positioned as a mainstream and high-end brand since the introduction of the original Athlon in 1999. The Athlon X2 differs from the Phenom by lacking an L3 Cache.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Athlon X2 6500 || Kuma (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || ?? W || ??.??
|-
| Athlon X2 7450 || Kuma (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 95 W || 39.58
|-
| Athlon X2 7550 || Kuma (65 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 95 W || 38
|-
| Athlon X2 7750 || Kuma (65 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 95 W || 35.19
|-
| Athlon X2 7750 Black Edition || Kuma (65 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 95 W || 35.19
|-
| Athlon X2 7850 || Kuma (65 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Athlon X2 5000+ || (45 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 65 W || 29.55
|}
===== [[Phenom]] =====
Released in 2007, the Phenom was AMD’s highest-end line of processors until the launch of the Phenom II. They were AMD’s first processors to be based on the K10 microarchitecture, so they introduced a plethora of new features, including 2 MB of L3 Cache, a faster HyperTransport link, a 128-bit FPU, a integrated memory controller that supports DDR2-1066 (PC2-8500) memory and were manufactured at a 65 nm process for the first time. AMD claims the Phenom X4 to be the first “true” quad-core processor, because it uses a monolithic die design rather than the multi-chip-module design used by the Core 2 Quad and quad-core Core 2 Extreme processors. Suffixes: B=Business class, e=energy efficient, Black Edition=unlocked clock multiplier.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Phenom X3 8250e || Toliman (65 nm) || 1.9 GHz || 65 W || 34.21
|-
| Phenom X3 8400 || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 95 W || 45.24
|-
| Phenom X3 8450e || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 65 W || 30.95
|-
| Phenom X3 8450 || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 95 W || 45.24
|-
| Phenom X3 8550 || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 95 W || 43.18
|-
| Phenom X3 8600 || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 95 W || 41.3
|-
| Phenom X3 8650 || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 95 W || 41.3
|-
| Phenom X3 8750 || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 95 W || 39.58
|-
| Phenom X3 8750 Black Edition || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 95 W || 39.58
|-
| Phenom X3 8850 || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 95 W || 38
|-
| Phenom X3 8600B || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 95 W || 41.3
|-
| Phenom X3 8750B || Toliman (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 95 W || 39.58
|-
| Phenom X4 9100e || Agena (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 65 W || 36.11
|-
| Phenom X4 9150e || Agena (65 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 65 W || 36.11
|-
| Phenom X4 9350e || Agena (65 nm) || 2 GHz || 65 W || 32.5
|-
| Phenom X4 9450e || Agena (65 nm) || 2.1 GHz || 65 W || 30.95
|-
| Phenom X4 9500 || Agena (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 95 W || 43.18
|-
| Phenom X4 9550 || Agena (65 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 95 W || 43.18
|-
| Phenom X4 9600 || Agena (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 95 W || 41.3
|-
| Phenom X4 9600 Black Edition || Agena (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 95 W || 41.3
|-
| Phenom X4 9650 || Agena (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 95 W || 41.3
|-
| Phenom X4 9700 || Agena (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 125 W || 52.08
|-
| Phenom X4 9750 || Agena (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 125 W or 95 W || 52.08 (125 W), 39.58 (95 W)
|-
| Phenom X4 9850 || Agena (65 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 125 W or 95 W || 50 (125 W), 38 (95 W)
|-
| Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition || Agena (65 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 125 W || 50
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 Black Edition || Agena (65 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 140 W or 125 W || 53.85 (140 W), 48.08 (125 W)
|-
| Phenom X4 9600B || Agena (65 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 95 W || 41.3
|-
| Phenom X4 9750B || Agena (65 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 95 W || 39.58
|}
===== [[Athlon II]] =====
The Athlon II adds triple- and quad-core processors to the initial dual-core Athlon X2 line. Suffixes: e=energy efficient.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Athlon II X2 215 || Regor (45 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 65 W || 24.07
|-
| Athlon II X2 235e || Regor (45 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 45 W || 16.67
|-
| Athlon II X2 240 || Regor (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 65 W || 23.21
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || Regor (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 45 W || 16.07
|-
| Athlon II X2 245 || Regor (45 nm) || 2.9 GHz || 65 W || 22.41
|-
| Athlon II X2 235e || Regor (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 65 W || 21.67
|-
| Athlon II X3 400e || Rana (45 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 45 W || 20.46
|-
| Athlon II X3 405e || Rana (45 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 45 W || 19.57
|-
| Athlon II X3 425 || Rana (45 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 95 W || 35.19
|-
| Athlon II X3 435 || Rana (45 nm) || 2.9 GHz || 95 W || 32.76
|-
| Athlon II X4 600e || Propus (45 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 45 W || 20.46
|-
| Athlon II X4 605e || Propus (45 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 45 W || 19.57
|-
| Athlon II X4 620 || Propus (45 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 95 W || 36.54
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || Propus (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|}
===== [[Phenom II]] =====
The Phenom II is AMD’s current high-end line of processors. The Phenom II models are a 45 nm die shrink of the original Phenom, so they reach higher clock speeds while keeping the same TDP. Also, a dual-core variant has been added to the Phenom II line. The Phenom II’s memory controller supports up to DDR3-1333 (PC3-10600) memory and they have 4 MB or 6 MB of L3 cache, but they lack the SSE4.2 instruction set found in the Core i7. Prefixies/Suffixes: B=Business class, e=energy efficient, Black Edition=unlocked clock multiplier.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Phenom II X2 545 || Callisto (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 80 W || 26.67
|-
| Phenom II X2 550 || Callisto (45 nm) || 3.1 GHz || 80 W || 25.81
|-
| Phenom II X2 555 || Callisto (45 nm) || 3.1 GHz || 80 W || 25.81
|-
| Phenom II X2 B53 || Callisto (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 80 W || 28.57
|-
| Phenom II X2 B55 || Callisto (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 80 W || 26.67
|-
| Phenom II X3 700e || Heka (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 65 W || 27.08
|-
| Phenom II X3 705e || Heka (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 65 W || 26
|-
| Phenom II X3 710 || Heka (45 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 95 W || 36.54
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || Heka (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition || Heka (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Phenom II X3 B73 || Heka (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Phenom II X3 B75 || Heka (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 95 W || 31.67
|-
| Phenom II X4 805 || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 95 W || 38
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 95 W || 36.54
|-
| Phenom II X4 900e || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 65 W || 27.08
|-
| Phenom II X4 905e || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 65 W || 26
|-
| Phenom II X4 910 || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 95 W || 36.54
|-
| Phenom II X4 920 || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 125 W || 44.64
|-
| Phenom II X4 925 || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Phenom II X4 945 || Deneb (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 125 W or 95 W || 41.67 (125 W), 31.67 (95 W)
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || Deneb (45 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 125 W || 39.06
|-
| Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition || Deneb (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 125 W || 41.67
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition || Deneb (45 nm) || 3.2 GHz || 125 W || 39.06
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition || Deneb (45 nm) || 3.4 GHz || 140 W or 125 W || 41.18 (140 W), 36.76 (125 W)
|-
| Phenom II X4 B93 || Deneb (45 nm) || 2.8 GHz || 95 W || 33.93
|-
| Phenom II X4 B95 || Deneb (45 nm) || 3 GHz || 95 W || 31.67
|}
===== [[AMD Duron|Duron]] =====
The Duron was released in 2000 as a lower-end alternative to the high-performance Athlon. The Duron had only 64 KB of L2 cache, but used the same double-pumped EV6 bus as the Athlon. The Duron however, did not use the Slot A package as the Athlon. AMD later replaced the Duron with the Sempron.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Duron 600 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 600 MHz || 27.4 W || 45.67
|-
| Duron 650 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 650 MHz || 29.4 W || 45.23
|-
| Duron 700 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 700 MHz || 31.4 W || 44.86
|-
| Duron 750 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 750 MHz || 33.4 W || 44.53
|-
| Duron 800 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 800 MHz || 35.4 W || 44.25
|-
| Duron 850 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 850 MHz || 37.4 W || 44
|-
| Duron 900 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 39.5 W || 43.89
|-
| Duron 950 || Spitfire (180 nm) || 950 MHz || 41.5 W || 43.68
|-
| Duron 900 || Morgan (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 42.7 W || 47.44
|-
| Duron 1000 || Morgan (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 46.1 W || 46.1
|-
| Duron 1100 || Morgan (180 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 50.3 W || 45.73
|-
| Duron 1200 || Morgan (180 nm) || 1.2 GHz || 54.7 W || 45.58
|-
| Duron 1300 || Morgan (180 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 60 W || 46.15
|-
| Duron 1400 || Morgan (180 nm) || 1.4 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Duron 1400 || Applebred (130 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 57 W || 38.57
|-
| Duron 1600 || Applebred (130 nm) || 1.6 GHz || 57 W || 35.63
|-
| Duron 1800 || Applebred (130 nm) || 1.8 GHz || 57 W || 31.67
|}
===== [[Sempron]] (K10-based) =====
While these Semprons are based on the K10 microarchitecture like the Athlon, Athlon II, Phenom and Phenom II, they do not have an L3 cache and are only have one active core because the Sempron is still a low-end line. The Sempron 140 is actually a dual-core processor with one core disabled. Although, overclockers have managed to reactivate the second core and overclock the processor.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power || TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Sempron 140 || Sargas (45 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 45 W || 16.67
|}
==== Mobile ====
===== [[Athlon|Mobile Athlon 4]] =====
The Mobile Athlon 4 was the first mobile version of the Athlon XP. Oddly, all Mobile Athlon 4 models clocked below 1.3 GHz do not have a model number.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 850 || Palomino (180 nm) || 850 MHz || 22 W || 25.88
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 900 || Palomino (180 nm) || 900 MHz || 24 W || 26.67
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 950 || Palomino (180 nm) || 950 MHz || 24 W || 25.26
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1000 || Palomino (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 25 W || 25
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1000 || Palomino (180 nm) || 1 GHz || 35 W || 35
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1100 || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 25 W || 22.73
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1100 || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.1 GHz || 35 W || 31.82
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1200 || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.2 MHz || 25 W || 20.83
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1200 || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.2 MHz || 35 W || 29.17
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1500+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.3 GHz || 35 W || 26.92
|-
| Mobile Athlon 4 1600+ || Palomino (180 nm) || 1.4 GHz || 35 W || 25
|}
===== AMD [[Turion 64]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Volts !! Power !! Clock Speed to Power ratio (MHz/W)
|-
|Turion 64 ML-28||1600 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 45.7
|-
|Turion 64 ML-30||1600 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 45.7
|-
|Turion 64 ML-32||1800 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 51.4
|-
|Turion 64 ML-34||1800 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 51.4
|-
|Turion 64 ML-37||2000 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 57.1
|-
|Turion 64 ML-40||2200 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 62.9
|-
|Turion 64 ML-42||2400 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 68.6
|-
|Turion 64 ML-44||2400 MHz||1.35V||35 W || 68.6
|-
|Turion 64 MK-36||2000 MHz||1.15V||31 W || 64.5
|-
|Turion 64 MK-38||2200 MHz||1.15V||31 W || 71.0
|-
|Turion 64 MT-28||1600 MHz||1.20V||25 W || 64.0
|-
|Turion 64 MT-30||1600 MHz||1.20V||25 W || 64.0
|-
|Turion 64 MT-32||1800 MHz||1.20V||25 W || 72.0
|-
|Turion 64 MT-34||1800 MHz||1.20V||25 W || 72.0
|-
|Turion 64 MT-37||2000 MHz||1.20V||25 W || 80.0
|-
|Turion 64 MT-40||2200 MHz||1.20V||25 W || 88.0
|}
===== AMD [[Turion 64 X2]] =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
!Model Number!!Clock Speed!![[CPU caches#Multi-level caches|L2-Cache]]!![[HyperTransport|HT]]!!Multiplier[[#fn 1|1]]!!Voltage!![[Thermal Design Power|TDP]]||Socket!!Release date!!Order Part Number
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-52 ||1600 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||8x||0.8-1.125 V||31W||Socket S1||17 May 2006||TMDTL52HAX5CT
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-56 ||1800 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||9x||0.8-1.125 V||33W||Socket S1||17 May 2006||TMDTL56HAX5CT
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-60 ||2000 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||10x||0.8-1.125 V||35W||Socket S1||17 May 2006||TMDTL60HAX5CT
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-64 ||2200 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||11x||0.80-1.125 V||35W||Socket S1||30 January 2007||TMDTL64HAX5CT
|-
|Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 ||1700 MHz||2×256kB||800 MHz||8.5x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||31W||[[Socket S1]]||August 20, 2007||AMDTK53HAX4DC
|-
|Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 ||1800 MHz||2×256kB||800 MHz||9x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||31W||Socket S1||August 20, 2007||AMDTK55HAX4DC
|-
|Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 ||1900 MHz||2×256kB||800 MHz||9.5x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||31W||Socket S1||August 20, 2007||AMDTK57HAX4DC
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-56 ||1800 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||9x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||31W||Socket S1||May 7, 2007||TMDTL56HAX5DC
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-58 ||1900 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||9.5x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||31W||Socket S1||May 7, 2007||TMDTL58HAX5DC
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-60 ||2000 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||10x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||31W||Socket S1||May 7, 2007||TMDTL60HAX5DC
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-62 ||2100 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||10.5x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||35W||Socket S1|| January 21, 2008||TMDTL62HAX5DM
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-64 ||2200 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||11x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||35W||Socket S1||May 7, 2007||TMDTL64HAX5DC
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-66 ||2300 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||11.5x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||35W||Socket S1||May 7, 2007
(July 10, 2007)||TMDTL66HAX5DC
|-
|Turion 64 X2 TL-68 ||2400 MHz||2×512kB||800 MHz||12x||1.075/1.10/1.125 V||35W||Socket S1||December 19, 2007||TMDTL68HAX5DM
|}
===== [[AMD Turion|Turion II]] =====
Launched in 2009, the Turion II processors are the first mobile processors to use the K10 microarchitecture and are a 45 nm die shrink of the Turion 64 X2 and Turion 64 X2 Ultra. Unlike the desktop Phenom processors based on the K10 microarchitecture, these models don’t have an L3 cache, but 1 MB or 2 MB of L2 cache.
{| class=”wikitable”
!Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Turion II M500 || Caspian (45 nm) || 2.2 GHz || 35 W || 15.91
|-
| Turion II M520 || Caspian (45 nm) || 2.3 GHz || 35 W || 15.22
|-
| Turion II M540 || Caspian (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 35 W || 14.58
|-
| Turion II Ultra M600 || Caspian (45 nm) || 2.4 GHz || 35 W || 14.58
|-
| Turion II Ultra M620 || Caspian (45 nm) || 2.5 GHz || 35 W || 14
|-
| Turion II Ultra M640 || Caspian (45 nm) || 2.6 GHz || 35 W || 13.46
|-
| Turion II Ultra M660 || Caspian (45 nm) || 2.7 GHz || 35 W || 12.96
|}
===== [[Sempron]] =====
The Sempron replaced the aging Duron processor line.
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Core !! Clock Speed !! Thermal Design Power !! TDP to Clock Speed Ratio (W/GHz)
|-
| Sempron 2200+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 62 W || 41.33
|-
| Sempron 2300+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.58 GHz || 62 W || 39.24
|-
| Sempron 2400+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.66 GHz || 62 W || 37.35
|-
| Sempron 2500+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.75 GHz || 62 W || 35.43
|-
| Sempron 2600+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 1.83 GHz || 62 W || 33.88
|-
| Sempron 2800+ || Thoroughbred (130 nm) || 2 GHz || 62 W || 31
|-
| Sempron 2200+ || Thortan (130 nm) || 1.5 GHz || 62 W || 41.33
|-
| Sempron 2400+ || Thortan (130 nm) || 1.66 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Sempron 2600+ || Thortan (130 nm) || 1.83 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|-
| Sempron 2800+ || Thortan (130 nm) || 2 GHz || 62 W || 31
|-
| Sempron 3000+ || Barton (130 nm) || 2 GHz || 62 W || 31
|-
| Sempron 3300+ || Barton (130 nm) || 2.2 GHz || ??.?? W || ??.??
|}
===== AMD Sempron 64 =====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power || Clock Speed to Power ratio (MHz/W)
|-
| 2500+ (Socket 754) || 1400 MHz || 62 [[watt|W]] || 22.6
|}
=== [[VIA]] processors ===
==== [[VIA C3]] ====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power
|-
| Nehemiah || 1000 MHz || 11.25 [[watt|W]]
|}
==== VIA [[VIA Eden|Eden-N]] ====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power
|-
| Eden-N || 533 MHz || 4 [[watt|W]]
|-
| Eden-N || 800 MHz || 6 [[watt|W]]
|-
| Eden-N || 1000 MHz || 7 [[watt|W]]
|}
==== [[VIA C7]] ====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power
|-
| C7 Esther || 1500 MHz || 12 [[watt|W]]
|-
| C7 Esther || 2000 MHz || 20 [[watt|W]]
|-
| C7-D Esther || 1800 MHz || 20 [[watt|W]]
|}
==== VIA [[VIA Eden|Eden ULV]] ====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power
|-
| Eden ULV || 500 MHz || ”’1”’ [[watt|W]]
|-
| Eden ULV || 1000 MHz || 3.5 [[watt|W]]
|-
| Eden ULV || 1500 MHz || 7.5 [[watt|W]]
|}
==== VIA Luke ====
{| class=”wikitable”
|-
! Model !! Clock Speed !! Power
|-
| Luke || 533 MHz || 6 [[watt|W]]
|-
| Luke || 800 MHz || 8 [[watt|W]]
|-
| Luke || 1000 MHz || 10 [[watt|W]]
|}
==Lists of Intel processors==
* [[Comparison of Intel processors]]
* [[List of Intel microprocessors]]
* [[List of Intel Celeron microprocessors]]
* [[List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors]]
* [[List of Intel Core microprocessors]]
* [[List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors]]
* [[List of Intel Atom microprocessors]]
==Lists of AMD processors==
* [[List of AMD microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Athlon microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Athlon XP microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Athlon X2 microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Duron microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Opteron microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Phenom microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Sempron microprocessors]]
* [[List of AMD Turion microprocessors]]
* [[List of future AMD microprocessors]]
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:List Of Cpu Power Dissipation}}
[[Category:Lists of microprocessors]]
[[de:CPU-Leistungsaufnahme]]
[[fi:Suorittimen tehonkulutus]]